🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that could add up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Opposition

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

The court's action comes amid a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior House figure stated the court had yet again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.